Our platform offers a unique article submission feature where you can register and submit your articles for review. Once submitted, our team will review your article, provide constructive feedback, and suggest improvements. Additionally, we recommend your work to users who are interested in similar writing topics, helping you reach a wider audience and connect with like-minded writers.
The quarterly journal of Mythic Society is a ...
The reputation of a journal, the rich repertoire of peer review process is crucial and vital. This necessitates the objective and well-defined role of blind review process as well as the opportunities to be accorded for the author/s to accept / modify / reject the review from peer review process.
Thus, Journal excellence is a function of not only academic supremacy of the Editorial Board but also how critical the Editorial Board and the reviewers are in admitting articles to the Journal based on the objectives laid down. depends upon the professionalism of its volunteer reviewers.
The journal follows a blind review process where the reviewer/s will receive article without display of author/s and their affiliation/s anywhere in the text.
The reviewer may prefer to accept or opt out of review with a benign response regarding the reason/s for opting out of review, which may range from not in the field of his/her expertise to lack of time at this juncture.
The Journal to have Chief Editor, Managing Editor. The Chief Editor to look after the academic part. The Managing Editor to look after the timeliness of response from Reviewer/s, response, feedback from author/s, in different rounds of reviews.
Timeliness in reviewing is essential. Many submissions are from junior faculty whose tenure or promotion might depend on the outcome of a review. Please try to meet the deadlines given for reviews. If you cannot meet the deadline, please let the managing editor know when to expect your review.
The potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
The articles will have a double-blind review process. Yet as a reviewer, if one cannot give an impartial review, one should disqualify oneself.
Suspected plagiarism or other breaches of ethics must be reported to Chief Editor.
The reviewer can seek details of data obtained, inscriptions, pictures, and other documents from the author/s for verification, ratification, confirmation pertaining to veracity of the article.
Manuscripts should be considered confidential and should not be shared, distributed to anyone else, should not make use of articles for any other purpose other than publication or for rejection or for modification.
Authors can create an account by selecting register button. If they already have an account, they can login by selecting login button. The status of the submitted article can be viewed by the authors after login.